Skip to content

Granted Summary Judgment in Restrictive Covenant Issue with Neighboring Landowner

Successfully obtained summary judgment in client’s favor in a suit by a neighboring landowner seeking to enforce a restrictive covenant. The neighbor—who had not been an original party to the restrictive covenant at issue—sought to enforce an interpretation of the covenant that would have substantially impacted the value of multiple lots in client’s residential development. The Court agreed with Bloom Sugarman’s arguments showing why the neighbor’s interpretation was incorrect as a matter of law under the recorded document, leaving only our client’s claim for attorneys’ fees pending in the case. The Georgia Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s order in our client’s favor.

Categories

Recent Posts

Bloom Parham Founding Partner Simon Bloom Appointed to the Board of Directors for the Council for Quality Growth

Land Use & Zoning Bootcamp – Video Webcast on June 6, 2019 at 10:00am

“Family Sues Boy Scouts Over Son’s Death,” CBS 46

“Mary Hall Freedom House Sues Sandy Springs for Discrimination,” Northside Neighbor

“Lawsuit Filed Against City of Sandy Springs,” CBS 46