Granted Summary Judgment in Restrictive Covenant Issue with Neighboring Landowner

Successfully obtained summary judgment in client’s favor in a suit by a neighboring landowner seeking to enforce a restrictive covenant. The neighbor—who had not been an original party to the restrictive covenant at issue—sought to enforce an interpretation of the covenant that would have substantially impacted the value of multiple lots in client’s residential development. The Court agreed with Bloom Sugarman’s arguments showing why the neighbor’s interpretation was incorrect as a matter of law under the recorded document, leaving only our client’s claim for attorneys’ fees pending in the case. The Georgia Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s order in our client’s favor.

Categories

Recent Posts

What are the effects of the Coronavirus Pandemic on my Sales Contracts

Third Party Inspections Facebook Live Q&A

Municipal Orders Related to Novel COVID-19

2020 Super Lawyers Announcement

Boys & Girls Clubs of Metro Atlanta Announces New Chair to Corporate Board